From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_FAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F62BC37 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:05:20 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEALN+LEpQRFuw/2dsb2JhbADKF4QKBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,323,1241388000"; d="scan'208";a="27574852" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 08 Jun 2009 12:05:20 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MDbjD-0003gT-9a for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 11:05:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:05:19 +0100 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Which types for representing HTML documents ? Message-ID: <20090608100519.GA14021@annexia.org> References: <20090608045957.GA7611@pema> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090608045957.GA7611@pema> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Richard Jones X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0200,:01 ocaml:01 variants:01 constructors:01 cduce:01 cduce:01 2009:98 polymorphic:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 represented:02 types:05 representing:05 examples:07 red:92 On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 06:59:57AM +0200, Sébastien Hinderer wrote: > Dear all, > > According to you, how could an HTML document best be represented in > OCaml ? > In particular: would you rather use classes or records, polymorphic > variants or normal constructors ? CDuce is worth considering: http://www.cduce.org/examples.html Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat