From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1BDBC37 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:50:15 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsICAGqDM0rRVd28mWdsb2JhbACYBz8BAQEBAQgLCgcTpyIJgQ+PAwEDAgSECQWGTw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,215,1243807200"; d="scan'208";a="41718924" Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com ([209.85.221.188]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2009 19:50:15 +0200 Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so3953192qyk.1 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:50:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:reply-to:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=zOmGjeXMlIfSJ2mt/bM0ptADzGxum0yXUbD9b+jdsjk=; b=NseRU3CjAS0P5zVeajOYNeKqgw2VBF0J7Mt8jGz0b0NSAG5MNQX7avrxzpGdhIu2bF gKqpn7mhTb5I8OMEvZBZPj5QLBgQPiNc3Qw5RzancVC2aJA49uGp1tFtYKsZ32X+HZkZ eF0fJQdhPvz/UBlO5dHFQaGnGvDQCZR5u3b3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:reply-to:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :message-id; b=g829Sd8EeK3kO24g1NOMXKG+zizg4BqRdjgtPZHIX1NMesMUfn57M4RiwPQlqpX2uK EHwiHsrOB4JaWScf5TCuhnN4ollR0stheauRp5aJsmuLx8onJn2srsoknjbo3TI0JWVn mUxxrZmt3XXMQ6isuCru6/cCZjtlqefRVy8p0= Received: by 10.224.28.80 with SMTP id l16mr5629042qac.71.1244915413587; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.21.1.137? (rez-ac3-wan.GW.McGill.CA [192.197.121.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm386839qwe.47.2009.06.13.10.50.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Peng Zang Reply-To: peng.zang@gmail.com To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Batteries and portability Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:50:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <4A30CD39.1010804@irisa.fr> <4A32535F.6020109@irisa.fr> In-Reply-To: <4A32535F.6020109@irisa.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906131350.09878.peng.zang@gmail.com> X-Spam: no; 0.00; hash:01 camomile:01 grebeniuk:01 camomile:01 runtime:01 peng:98 peng:98 2009:98 wrote:01 dmitry:01 caml-list:01 portability:02 seems:03 gnu:03 upstream:04 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone pushed this patch upstream to the camomile author(s)? It seems like a good change that should be made in the original sources to make it more portable... Peng On Friday 12 June 2009 09:08:47 am Tiphaine Turpin wrote: > The following completed patch works for me. > > Tiphaine > > dmitry grebeniuk a écrit : > > If you really don't use camomile and it is not used > > in batteries indirectly, you can defer initialization. > > Apply the patch to camomile: > > http://overbld.abcname.net/files/camomile-noprecomp.html > > But the patch has a [small] runtime cost. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKM+bRfIRcEFL/JewRAvjYAJsG79fJRftdZCt+wiSyFqub0HJjDwCgs+VJ zKzqnoayxrloWHtMBCzyfx4= =qAaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----