From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0798BC37 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:51:12 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0DAGsocErUnwdkbGdsb2JhbACCIZd2CA0HEQa6SIQRBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,289,1246831200"; d="scan'208";a="31861050" Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net ([212.159.7.100]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 29 Jul 2009 19:51:12 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAFspcErUnw4T/2dsb2JhbACCIdJUhBEF Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net ([212.159.14.19]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 29 Jul 2009 18:51:11 +0100 Received: from [87.115.75.10] (helo=leper.local) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1MWDJ1-0006hX-FI for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:51:11 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] annotations and type-checking Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:01:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <20090729.233928.59476910.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <20090729.233928.59476910.garrigue@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907292001.02773.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: f6a553dd916b8757f01f7da67c863a96 X-Spam: no; 0.00; annotations:01 annotations:01 2009:98 frog:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 variables:02 garrigue:03 jacques:03 arguments:07 useful:09 subtlety:09 instance:10 interesting:12 ltd:87 On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:39:28 Jacques Garrigue wrote: > Because it is useful to be able to have type annotations sharing type > variables in different places in a term (for instance for different > arguments). That's very interesting. I had taken this for granted and never noticed this subtlety before... -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e