From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63081BC37 for ; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:01:51 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0CALrToUrUGyoFlGdsb2JhbACbOwEBAQEJCwgJEwO8V4QXBYJG X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,336,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="33766953" Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2009 12:01:50 +0200 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CB1D48135; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:01:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from apc.happyleptic.org (happyleptic.org [82.67.194.89]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567DD480D9; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from deb.happyleptic.org (unknown [192.168.1.20]) by apc.happyleptic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE92A334FD; Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:01:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rixed by deb.happyleptic.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mjs5U-00018Q-OQ; Sat, 05 Sep 2009 12:01:40 +0200 Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 12:01:40 +0200 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: Edgar Friendly Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? Message-ID: <20090905100140.GA4336@deb.happyleptic.org> References: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A9FBF04.1060608@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 toplevel:01 compile:01 caml-list:01 library:03 complex:05 batteries:91 batteries:91 i'm:09 i'm:09 explain:11 sort:12 difficult:13 > 5) It's difficult to compile against I tried to use it once but failed to find documentation on how to use it with OCamlMakefile. > 8) Other (please explain) I'm still learning OCaml and I'm afraid that batteries, beeing both a library and sort of replacement for OCaml (replace compiler, toplevel...), would be too complex to comprehend.