From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BCBBBAF for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:18:51 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkGAP/zpkrUNQVbcWdsb2JhbACbQAEKCg0HE8E4hBgFgVQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,357,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="35722402" Received: from postbode01.versateladsl.be ([212.53.5.91]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Sep 2009 09:18:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 28768 invoked by uid 0); 9 Sep 2009 07:18:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO poincare.swapping.umh.ac.be) ([94.109.153.160]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.versateladsl.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Sep 2009 07:18:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost ident=trch) by poincare.swapping.umh.ac.be with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlHS1-00015g-J0; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:18:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:18:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20090909.091844.743406771990426927.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be> To: mihamina@gulfsat.mg Cc: OCaml Mailing List Subject: Re: [Caml-list] probability of some events From: Christophe TROESTLER In-Reply-To: <4AA73950.9000901@gulfsat.mg> References: <4AA73950.9000901@gulfsat.mg> X-Face: #2fb%mPx>rRL@4ff~TVgZ"<[:,oL"`TUEGK/[8/qb58~C>jR(x4A+v/n)7BgpEtIph_neoLKJBq0JBY9:}8v|j Organization: University of Mons Return-Receipt-To: Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be Disposition-Notification-To: Christophe.Troestler@umons.ac.be X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; christophe:01 troestler:01 christophe:01 troestler:01 ocaml:01 ocaml:01 camlp:01 camlp:01 syntax:01 cheers:01 2009:98 ,...:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 probability:01 Hi, On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:12:48 +0300, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > > Are you aware of such future changes in OCaml, that would lead to > incompatibility? I of course can't speak for the OCaml core developers but they have been very cautious not to introduce this kind of incompatibility. Now, OCaml is also different as it possess the wonderful Camlp4. In case such incompatibility would be required to move forward, it is very likely that a camlp4 syntax extension would be developed to translate your code automatically as much as possible. > We intend to begin huge developments in OCaml (Web, GUI, system,...) > and such changes will make our task a bit more difficult. Great to hear ! Cheers, ChriS