From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CE7BBAF for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:09:11 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0BAJKNtUrUGyoFkWdsb2JhbACbCgEBAQEJCwoHEwOxdoQbBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,418,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="34618671" Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2009 11:09:09 +0200 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D86D480BD for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:09:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yeeloong (happyleptic.org [82.67.194.89]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C120AD48180 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:09:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by yeeloong (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:08:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:08:48 +0200 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Scilab: Why not written in OCaml? Message-ID: <20090920090848.GB11999@yeeloong> References: <20090919005953.20724aglhumqekfd@webmail.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090919005953.20724aglhumqekfd@webmail.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam: no; 0.00; scilab:01 ocaml:01 inria's:01 ocaml:01 sml:01 caml-list:01 guess:04 princeton:06 probably:07 written:07 written:07 university:10 same:17 that:23 why:24 > ...why is that program not written with INRIA's Ocaml? Probably for the same reason than all Princeton university programs are not written in SML/NJ (so I guess) ?