From: Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org>
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OC4MC : OCaml for Multicore architectures
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:49:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090924164933.GA5637@annexia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909241409.56894.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 02:09:56PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> Fair enough. I think this is the single most important development OCaml has
> seen since its inception so I would personally drop OCaml in favor of oc4mc
> even if it meant reverting to 3.10.2.
I think 'personally' is the key word there. You forget that people
are quite happily programming in very slow languages like Perl,
Python, Ruby and Visual Basic, and those people vastly outnumber the
ones using F#, Haskell, OCaml, SML etc. (They don't even have static
safety, dammit!).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones
Red Hat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 21:30 Philippe Wang
2009-09-23 10:53 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-23 12:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 14:26 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 23:15 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:05 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 0:01 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 1:47 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 9:49 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 10:00 ` rixed
2009-09-24 10:40 ` Florian Hars
2009-09-24 11:45 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 10:00 ` kcheung
2009-09-24 11:52 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 11:55 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 12:11 ` rixed
2009-09-24 15:58 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:39 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 16:49 ` Richard Jones [this message]
2009-09-24 16:56 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 17:36 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 19:39 ` rixed
2009-09-24 21:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 21:26 ` rixed
2009-09-25 4:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2009-09-25 7:32 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-09-25 10:17 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 13:04 ` kcheung
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2009-09-25 9:33 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-26 16:55 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 8:08 ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-09-25 15:05 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-09-25 23:26 ` Benjamin Canou
2009-09-26 0:45 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 1:53 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-26 13:51 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 14:46 ` Jon Harrop
2009-10-10 4:01 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 13:40 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 14:22 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:49 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:55 ` Mike Lin
2009-09-24 14:52 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 15:36 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:50 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:14 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 13:11 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 14:51 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:57 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:11 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 14:38 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:20 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 23:28 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 23:25 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 14:11 ` Philippe Wang
2009-11-08 18:12 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 18:24 ` David Teller
[not found] <20090924154716.BCD0ABC5A@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-09-24 16:02 ` Pascal Cuoq
2009-09-24 16:30 ` Philippe Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090924164933.GA5637@annexia.org \
--to=rich@annexia.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).