From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OC4MC : OCaml for Multicore architectures
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:26:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090924212603.GA13050@yeeloong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909242209.50565.jon@ffconsultancy.com>
> Visual Basic has been a *lot* faster than OCaml for several years now, not
> (...) Even Python (...) Java and C#. They are far more popular than OCaml for many
> reasons but parallel threads to make efficient multicore programming easy is
> a big one.
In general you sounds like a reasonable and knowledgeable person, yet in
some messages you seam to completely lose contact with reality.
Either you have a small kid at home who steals your identity when you
are away, or, considering that it always happens when the toppic gets
close to concurrency or the dotnet platform, you might be suffering
in some way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-24 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 21:30 Philippe Wang
2009-09-23 10:53 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-23 12:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 14:26 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 23:15 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:05 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 0:01 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 1:47 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 9:49 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 10:00 ` rixed
2009-09-24 10:40 ` Florian Hars
2009-09-24 11:45 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 10:00 ` kcheung
2009-09-24 11:52 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 11:55 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 12:11 ` rixed
2009-09-24 15:58 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:39 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 16:49 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 16:56 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 17:36 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 19:39 ` rixed
2009-09-24 21:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 21:26 ` rixed [this message]
2009-09-25 4:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2009-09-25 7:32 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-09-25 10:17 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 13:04 ` kcheung
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2009-09-25 9:33 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-26 16:55 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 8:08 ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-09-25 15:05 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-09-25 23:26 ` Benjamin Canou
2009-09-26 0:45 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 1:53 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-26 13:51 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 14:46 ` Jon Harrop
2009-10-10 4:01 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 13:40 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 14:22 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:49 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:55 ` Mike Lin
2009-09-24 14:52 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 15:36 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:50 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:14 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 13:11 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 14:51 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:57 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:11 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 14:38 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:20 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 23:28 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 23:25 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 14:11 ` Philippe Wang
2009-11-08 18:12 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 18:24 ` David Teller
[not found] <20090924154716.BCD0ABC5A@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-09-24 16:02 ` Pascal Cuoq
2009-09-24 16:30 ` Philippe Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090924212603.GA13050@yeeloong \
--to=rixed@happyleptic.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).