From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OC4MC : OCaml for Multicore architectures
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:53:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909260253.36868.jon@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60914.70.26.44.194.1253925950.squirrel@pegasus.carleton.ca>
On Saturday 26 September 2009 01:45:50 kcheung@math.carleton.ca wrote:
> Perhaps an off-topic and naive question: What does it take to beat F# and
> still have predictable performance?
Provided you're talking abouts today's machines and don't care about pause
times, HLVM with a parallel GC (not unlike the oc4mc one) and a task library
would beat F# and still have predictable performance.
--
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-26 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-22 21:30 Philippe Wang
2009-09-23 10:53 ` [Caml-list] " Goswin von Brederlow
2009-09-23 12:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 13:00 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 14:26 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:21 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-23 23:15 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 0:05 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 0:01 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 1:47 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 9:49 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 10:00 ` rixed
2009-09-24 10:40 ` Florian Hars
2009-09-24 11:45 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 10:00 ` kcheung
2009-09-24 11:52 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 11:55 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 12:11 ` rixed
2009-09-24 15:58 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:39 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 16:49 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 16:56 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 17:36 ` Richard Jones
2009-09-24 19:39 ` rixed
2009-09-24 21:09 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 21:26 ` rixed
2009-09-25 4:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2009-09-25 7:32 ` Hugo Ferreira
2009-09-25 10:17 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 13:04 ` kcheung
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2009-09-25 9:33 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 21:39 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-26 16:55 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-25 8:08 ` Stéphane Glondu
2009-09-25 15:05 ` Xavier Leroy
2009-09-25 23:26 ` Benjamin Canou
2009-09-26 0:45 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 1:53 ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2009-09-26 13:51 ` kcheung
2009-09-26 14:46 ` Jon Harrop
2009-10-10 4:01 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 13:40 ` Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2009-09-24 14:22 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:49 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 13:55 ` Mike Lin
2009-09-24 14:52 ` Stefano Zacchiroli
2009-09-24 15:36 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:50 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 12:14 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 13:11 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 14:51 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:57 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 14:11 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 14:38 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-24 15:20 ` Dario Teixeira
2009-09-24 23:28 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 23:25 ` Philippe Wang
2009-09-25 14:11 ` Philippe Wang
2009-11-08 18:12 ` Jon Harrop
2009-09-24 18:24 ` David Teller
[not found] <20090924154716.BCD0ABC5A@yquem.inria.fr>
2009-09-24 16:02 ` Pascal Cuoq
2009-09-24 16:30 ` Philippe Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909260253.36868.jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).