From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D6CBBAF for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:41:38 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhUFAIOTzkrVujhf/2dsb2JhbACBUdkMhCoE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,530,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="37898055" Received: from witko.kerneis.info ([213.186.56.95]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 Oct 2009 10:41:37 +0200 Received: from alf94-4-82-224-79-17.fbx.proxad.net ([82.224.79.17] helo=hokahe.kerneis.info) by witko.kerneis.info with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MwB2e-0006IX-AF; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:41:36 +0200 Received: from gabriel by hokahe.kerneis.info with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MwB2d-0001iN-RA; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:41:35 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:41:35 +0200 From: Gabriel Kerneis To: Virgile Prevosto Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why type inference fails in this code Message-ID: <20091009084135.GA6397@kerneis.info> Mail-Followup-To: Virgile Prevosto , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <53322.41.177.16.252.1255065941.squirrel@41.177.16.252> <20091009070935.GA5141@kerneis.info> <20091009102218.639677c8@is010235> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091009102218.639677c8@is010235> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.224.79.17 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gabriel@kerneis.info X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on witko.kerneis.info); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam: no; 0.00; inference:01 0200,:01 forall:01 2009:98 wrote:01 pps:01 caml-list:01 jussieu:01 confusing:02 fri:05 fails:05 exists:05 i'm:09 wrong:10 should:13 On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:22:18AM +0200, Virgile Prevosto wrote: > Well, I'm afraid this the other way round Yes, sorry, I should have checked before posting since I always get it wrong, confusing forall and exists. Regards, -- Gabriel