From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09C6BBAF for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:59:16 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuQMADOYzkrVujhf/2dsb2JhbACBUZILxxKEKgQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,530,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="37899291" Received: from witko.kerneis.info ([213.186.56.95]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 Oct 2009 10:59:16 +0200 Received: from alf94-4-82-224-79-17.fbx.proxad.net ([82.224.79.17] helo=hokahe.kerneis.info) by witko.kerneis.info with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MwBJk-0006XS-Mp for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:59:16 +0200 Received: from gabriel by hokahe.kerneis.info with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MwBJk-0001jv-AW for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:59:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:59:16 +0200 From: Gabriel Kerneis To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why type inference fails in this code Message-ID: <20091009085916.GB6397@kerneis.info> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr References: <53322.41.177.16.252.1255065941.squirrel@41.177.16.252> <20091009070935.GA5141@kerneis.info> <20091009102218.639677c8@is010235> <20091009084135.GA6397@kerneis.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091009084135.GA6397@kerneis.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.224.79.17 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gabriel@kerneis.info X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on witko.kerneis.info); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam: no; 0.00; inference:01 0200,:01 forall:01 2009:98 wrote:01 pps:01 caml-list:01 caml-list:01 jussieu:01 caml:02 confusing:02 fri:05 fails:05 exists:05 inria:06 On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:41:35AM +0200, Gabriel Kerneis wrote: > Yes, sorry, I should have checked before posting since I always get it > wrong, confusing forall and exists. And just in case someone else on this list does not understand (or remember) the difference, he should read the following thread: http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2007/05/08f6ca7a2c045d2801f2a2cc0ae8aa63.en.html Enlighting! -- Gabriel