From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D92BC37 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:17:07 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiwDAMOY1ErUnwcjimdsb2JhbACCIJhoAQEBCgkMBxEGvhCELQQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,553,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="48542919" Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net ([212.159.7.35]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 14 Oct 2009 00:17:07 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArgGAP+Y1ErUnw4S/2dsb2JhbACCINc5hC0E Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net ([212.159.14.18]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2009 23:17:06 +0100 Received: from [87.112.28.140] (helo=leper.local) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Mxpg2-0002pt-FW for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:17:06 +0100 From: Jon Harrop Organization: Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] HLVM stuff Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:18:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200909280014.58488.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <4DB7BEFB-70C6-4ADA-B0F9-4ED0717A85B6@refined-audiometrics.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB7BEFB-70C6-4ADA-B0F9-4ED0717A85B6@refined-audiometrics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910132318.03031.jon@ffconsultancy.com> X-Plusnet-Relay: aa1f585b274185b22a113a6775779699 X-Spam: no; 0.01; fwiw:01 2009:98 blog:98 2009:98 frog:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 stuff:09 interesting:12 ltd:87 mcclain:13 david:14 www:84 september:16 On Monday 28 September 2009 01:35:32 David McClain wrote: > Yes, this is beginning to sound very interesting... FWIW, I wrote this up as a blog post here: http://flyingfrogblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/f-vs-ocaml.html -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e