From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6082BBAF for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:03:06 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPuw3krVujhf/2dsb2JhbADbZYQxBIJV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,597,1249250400"; d="scan'208";a="49015352" Received: from witko.kerneis.info ([213.186.56.95]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 21 Oct 2009 16:03:06 +0200 Received: from [2001:660:3301:8061:21c:25ff:fecf:737a] (helo=rhodium.pps.jussieu.fr) by witko.kerneis.info with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N0bmM-0002YF-0S for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:03:06 +0200 Received: from kerneis by rhodium.pps.jussieu.fr with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N0bm2-0001n1-3I for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:02:46 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:02:46 +0200 From: Gabriel Kerneis To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlbuild documentation Message-ID: <20091021140246.GA6818@rhodium.pps.jussieu.fr> References: <4ADE21A6.3020803@gnu.org> <4ADECA9A.7000308@lri.fr> <243054520910210636p71b8d17etf28a5a5ac11dfbe6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <243054520910210636p71b8d17etf28a5a5ac11dfbe6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:660:3301:8061:21c:25ff:fecf:737a X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kerneis@pps.jussieu.fr X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on witko.kerneis.info); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam: no; 0.00; 2009:98 beginners:01 wrote:01 pps:01 caml-list:01 jussieu:01 repository:03 long:06 wed:06 examples:07 theme:09 setting:10 might:12 idea:13 oct:14 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 06:36:52AM -0700, Erick Matsen wrote: > This is such a common theme on this list, I wonder if it would be > worth setting up a repository of well-commented Ocamlbuild examples. > That would go a long way towards helping beginners (like myself) out. Since ocamlbuild is (unofficially) unmaintained, I wonder if this is such a good idea. You might prefer to swich to a more perennial system (like make). Regards, -- Gabriel, only half-kidding