From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4D5BBAF for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:29:00 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtwAADVlGEvUGyoFkWdsb2JhbACcBwEBAQEJCwoHEwO4f4QyBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,340,1257116400"; d="scan'208";a="39263748" Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2009 10:28:59 +0100 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10850D4818C for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:28:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from apc.happyleptic.org (happyleptic.org [82.67.194.89]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CDCD4806E for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:28:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by apc.happyleptic.org (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 690CC33519; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:28:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:28:50 +0100 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: What is CPAN? (was: Re: Hoogle for Ocaml) Message-ID: <20091204092849.GA4071@apc> References: <20091203161710.GA14880@annexia.org> <20091203165100.GA17415@fp-desktop.fr.evistel.com> <20091203180036.GA17732@annexia.org> <1259869258.15350.46.camel@flake.lan.gerd-stolpmann.de> <20091203212127.GB16114@yeeloong> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Spam: no; 0.00; cpan:01 ocaml:01 dirs:01 2009:98 caml-list:01 debian:04 upstream:04 fri:05 dec:05 scan:06 i'm:09 file:11 directory:11 build:13 should:13 -[ Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:57:35AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall ]---- > Yes of course. You can use ocamlcore.org website to do that. I have > already a proof of concept using "uscan" + Debian watch file, to scan > for new upstream on a weekly basis. Why not using godi_make fetch in all available build dirs, which will download everything not already present in the distfiles directory ? I'm trying this right now, then I will firewall everything but my test box and see if I can make use of this as a backup... Should we switch to GODI mailing list now ?