From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4B7BBAF for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:19 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0CAFMXL0vUGyoFkWdsb2JhbACbUgEBAQEJCwoHEwO5aYQuBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,431,1257116400"; d="scan'208";a="39124640" Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Dec 2009 15:40:18 +0100 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E578BD48127 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from apc.happyleptic.org (happyleptic.org [82.67.194.89]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065C1D480D5 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from fp-desktop.fr.evistel.com (ev [88.169.116.225]) by apc.happyleptic.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70E6334FD for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from ccellier by fp-desktop.fr.evistel.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NMjQe-00013a-U5 for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:08 +0100 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] general question, was Re: OCaml is broken Message-ID: <20091221144008.GE2033@fp-desktop.fr.evistel.com> References: <4B2D2BC1.6020204@msu.edu> <200912200443.57698.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <200912201938.06729.jon@ffconsultancy.com> <20091221152631.35b3a2eb@pbmiha.malagasy.com> <8D2436E9-A41B-48D4-B844-A82E57D47CA2@pulsschlag.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8D2436E9-A41B-48D4-B844-A82E57D47CA2@pulsschlag.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 trolls:01 caml-list:01 functional:02 programming:03 programming:03 discussion:06 discussion:06 wrong:10 might:12 question:13 but:14 broken:14 language:15 > following this discussion, i am not so sure anymore, if ocaml is a good decision. may be i got this discussion wrong, but if ocaml is dying out, i might have to look for another functional programming language to use with my project. Every programming language suffers its trolls and flamewars.