From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ygrekheretix@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B574BC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon,  1 Mar 2010 21:34:14 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0BAEyzi0vRVdzfimdsb2JhbACRG4lkCBUBAQEKCQwHEQUfrUSBXIQ3LYhKAQEDBQiEbgQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,562,1262559600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="45718953"
Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.220.223])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Mar 2010 21:34:13 +0100
Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so544166fxm.3
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:34:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject
         :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=RHUp0g7iaU7wTwpoXDIAjSQe4iljCQtW3WCX2miCaeM=;
        b=x90ahJiObw5G9ABDKOcpZtCjxT6kvQNxR2NM5jfxXOz3u3PF75C182rOkNBWrSZder
         cvjNOKiePeZUV3mXyqoAHYjqUb6baoVa1t/SgPrBDnZ22Pcl7wC0yKdVzKr6mMSnoHy6
         lg9PR1PnZbGIjst1KzgIpn22GxN83LjqvMeQk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=aUoZ93yd1wCfCZag2N+y5Q+8ryf9nSTnN0CLh7eBAAX1x77T2yuWYzYgCCbiMjZHh/
         S5GwQ7LkX2PHtzSeoMqK6hyELMn5v2xTl+2Ipm4IvrIMGDC2o/nnZAgubGSmMJSV9t/I
         yR4kckBP8WvKpa96HHru7P4WTcf4URMQKyiKo=
Received: by 10.223.3.135 with SMTP id 7mr5639700fan.21.1267475653361;
        Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:34:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lemon (61-228-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.228.61])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm2440767fxm.15.2010.03.01.12.34.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:34:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:34:02 +0200
From: ygrek <ygrekheretix@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Event.channel memory leak?
Message-Id: <20100301223402.86592074.ygrekheretix@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1E9A95E-117C-461D-89DF-738CA8C70D14@itpl.co.jp>
References: <D1E9A95E-117C-461D-89DF-738CA8C70D14@itpl.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; macos:01 wrote:01 caml-list:01 behaviour:01 channel:06 exhibit:07 memory:09 memory:09 compact:09 0900:09 environment:10 doesn't:12 version:13 leak:14 but:14 

On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:04:31 +0900
Satoshi Ogasawara <ogasawara@itpl.co.jp> wrote:

> But, the next code makes increasing of memory use rapidly in my environment.
> (version 3.11.2 on MacOS X leopard)

Using Gc.compact instead of Gc.full_major doesn't exhibit such behaviour.

-- 
 ygrek
 http://ygrek.org.ua