From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DBF5BC57 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:58:48 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwJAG+h00vUVZsV/2dsb2JhbACcJg5xu1OFDAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,269,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="57715543" Received: from cerberus.snarc.org ([212.85.155.21]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Apr 2010 10:58:48 +0200 Received: by cerberus.snarc.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8CB27129F5; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:58:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:58:47 +0100 From: Vincent Hanquez To: Sylvain Le Gall Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: SHA1 => stdlib ?! Message-ID: <20100425085846.GA8036@snarc.org> References: <20100424142747.18553coxijfxshc3@webmail.in-berlin.de> <20100424162844.37911eihdab7zsws@webmail.in-berlin.de> <4BD30857.30504@grant-olson.net> <20100424171143.119877hl2l4ov9kf@webmail.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Warning: Email may contain unsmilyfied humor and/or satire. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; stdlib:01 ocaml:01 bindings:01 wrote:01 cryptokit:01 cryptokit:01 caml-list:01 argument:02 apr:06 vincent:07 vincent:07 arguments:07 leroy:07 written:07 things:13 On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 03:29:08PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > Cryptokit is written by X. Leroy, the same author as OCaml. what about technical arguments/reasons instead of fanboyism ? cryptokit has lots of good things, and some reason to choose them over my ocaml-sha bindings, but i find the argument you just made pretty distasteful. -- Vincent