From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F21BBAF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:03:51 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgBANeDtUyBaB4OmWdsb2JhbAChTxUBAQEBAQgLCgcRIr46hUgEhm+IUYYm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,326,1283724000"; d="scan'208";a="80961507" Received: from mx-a.polytechnique.fr ([129.104.30.14]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2010 19:03:44 +0200 Received: from argos.lix.polytechnique.fr (argos.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.2]) by mx-a.polytechnique.fr (tbp 5.3.2/2.0.7) with ESMTP id o9DH3Ypb000310; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:03:34 +0200 Received: from mailhost.lix.polytechnique.fr (pomerol.lix.polytechnique.fr [129.104.11.158]) by argos.lix.polytechnique.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406CBAACB9; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:11:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from schwander@localhost) by mailhost.lix.polytechnique.fr (8.14.4/8.12.8/Submit) id o9DGB1jY005577; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:11:01 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:11:01 +0200 From: Olivier Schwander To: Jianzhou Zhao Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] convertion between OCaml Big_int and C Message-ID: <20101013161101.GB4675@pomerol.lix.polytechnique.fr> References: <20101013144829.GB28174@pomerol.lix.polytechnique.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 mlgmp:01 numerix:01 numerix:01 inrialpes:01 pop-art:01 zhao:98 caml-list:01 computation:01 int:01 int:01 caml:02 caml:02 hump:02 hump:02 Le 13 Oct 2010 12:01, Jianzhou Zhao a écrit: > Thanks. Are they the MLGMP and Numerix listed in "the Caml Hump: > General purpose libraries :: Numeric computation" ? > http://caml.inria.fr/cgi-bin/hump.en.cgi?sort=0&browse=75 > From the documents of Numerix, it runs much faster than the big_int > library, although it may not be as portable as the 'nat' that big_int > replies on. Yes, there is also mlgmpidl . Olivier