From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2911DBC57 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:52:18 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUEADun4kxYxkJF/2dsb2JhbACUQI5zwHaFSwSKWIV7 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,207,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="78716824" Received: from a.ns.draxit.de (HELO mail.draxit.de) ([88.198.66.69]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA; 17 Nov 2010 00:52:17 +0100 Received: from narfi.yggdrasil.draxit.de (ppp-93-104-33-35.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.33.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.draxit.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC9B51D4D4 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:52:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:52:15 +0100 From: Wolfgang Draxinger To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SMP multithreading Message-ID: <20101117005215.5dc5ebcd@narfi.yggdrasil.draxit.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101115182737.42b8dcae@loki.yggdrasil.draxit.de> <4CE228CA.3030503@gmail.com> <1289927042.16005.176.camel@thinkpad> <1289945605.16005.205.camel@thinkpad> Organization: DraxIT X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: no; 0.00; eray:01 ozkural:01 ocaml:01 haskell:01 maillist:98 competitor:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 ghc:01 wolfgang:02 wolfgang:02 i'd:06 wed:06 0200:07 quite:08 On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:04:54 +0200 Eray Ozkural wrote: > [readworthy text] I'd like to point out how the big competitor to OCaml deals with it. The GHC Haskell system has SMP parallization built in for some time, and it does it quite well. Wolfgang