From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2442BBAF for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 22:38:23 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugBAMsf6UzRVaE2kGdsb2JhbACUVY18CBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6J8iWOCGINJLohZAQEDBYVGBIpeg3Q X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,232,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="67779361" Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com ([209.85.161.54]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2010 22:38:23 +0100 Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so4448826fxm.27 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type; bh=2z7j9/oYK3QM8q2JNWo3bRrrDH4wHqhtnMkLF7jyuDs=; b=mIoUuuAhpqwNdbj2BRzWHPwRzzJOlAgatmgJbchLL3RmuFHhQI/Jj7GFOaJtTormmP G7iIrT7XqdtZRyP2tE/ix9K+T3D6jia0oEz80w6Nx07ve//7iQ6Y75khrGjLqhpwDus8 IgHarL9mGG04818XSPOn+lCu+3B8H/Leepd+Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=fJkTwyx7TrekIZUTYAw3mXtwyAPByH/BzopL9Ujx5NUUd/q+J3ssibfo863i3oLhu8 FTqrJ7WQgkMI+T1/Fqdjj3j8F5FomMXPSX1Ukuo3xqeBfjMrzWmZ1AuPh0p0OwVLZK++ Pm7Wps3MslBxeRP8LQ2cFC8w0Il+UbWAbjHME= Received: by 10.223.110.202 with SMTP id o10mr3368981fap.1.1290375500283; Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from lemon.local.tld (173-138-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.138.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l23sm1127657fam.19.2010.11.21.13.38.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:38:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:38:05 +0200 From: ygrek To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Looking for stubs for sendmsg/recvmsg Message-Id: <20101121233805.f6f2d10c.ygrekheretix@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <87d3q21qe4.fsf@frosties.localnet> <87ipztl2ld.fsf@frosties.localnet> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Sun__21_Nov_2010_23_38_06_+0200_SdKkG9U9nwvhfWqT" X-Spam: no; 0.00; stubs:01 le-gall:01 functor:01 val:01 wrote:01 unix:01 caml-list:01 functions:01 int:01 descr:02 module:03 macro:03 fri:05 uses:07 0000:91 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" --Signature=_Sun__21_Nov_2010_23_38_06_+0200_SdKkG9U9nwvhfWqT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > > > Would that be something for extunix too? > > >=20 > I don't think so. At least, this is not currently the purpose of > extunix...=20 =20 =46rom implementation point of view this means that ExtUnix is a functor ov= er=20 file_descr type and C side uses specific macro instead of Int_val - not a b= ig deal.=20 But in order to be useful all functions from the Unix module should be dupl= icated -=20 not very funny. --=20 ygrek http://ygrek.org.ua --Signature=_Sun__21_Nov_2010_23_38_06_+0200_SdKkG9U9nwvhfWqT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzpkT4ACgkQY0a5RXCNWgwRfgCg2V/7b26zBvEKvfI9noPhtl9q qp0AoNQ/3uv+TFRoBjlzj+3gkclVOcZE =WggJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__21_Nov_2010_23_38_06_+0200_SdKkG9U9nwvhfWqT--