From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <edwintorok@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30376BBAF
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:14:38 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMBAEeh60zRVaA2kGdsb2JhbACULo4sCBUBAQEBCQkMBxEDH6Q+iWSCGIUdLohZAQEDBYVGBI5Tggk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,243,1288566000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="89203529"
Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2010 20:14:37 +0100
Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so3381455pwi.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:14:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject
         :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=95/M9eCkLmCUafPE1joFM1uYkflqEYgFubf05IPdGj4=;
        b=RH2Eec+XUrMttSk3W8oZWazl0gYT00bqOIeDsmbQVXLXzx94EL3BE+tq1t2NAj9UH0
         UheVX607/QEFPtTgtaDl6Z3/kHh5ag9wjRPN8cUU+rSx7BBPU7OHeuJfcejwJ3HF/QnN
         4xwQNQgl0FPQLCASIdGjxRLX2lUYydbYwjzq4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=mrfdVpySbhJlPPfhn/4Em5Exbv9JlmsO4Bcex/V4klLBuPOLj6FDq8QHhSNEkUjupQ
         IYseb8tSxo7ndtXmCdIBeJROiy62Q6D3taxmgKRT19w+BjcSVc3iHN7YJ6/KlZBDwsSC
         uUT0UA9CSBqwCyxeA5P5uk5R7wrBT8Kc+JK0Y=
Received: by 10.223.86.9 with SMTP id q9mr2027447fal.25.1290539675577;
        Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from deb0 ([79.114.97.145])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4sm1796083fav.21.2010.11.23.11.14.34
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:14:31 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?VMO2csO2aw==?= Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com>
To: Isaac Gouy <igouy2@yahoo.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast?
Message-ID: <20101123211431.4a518a83@deb0>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20101123T190142-212@post.gmane.org>
References: <1290434674.16005.354.camel@thinkpad>
	<AANLkTi=nsgA3qEmpj0=89AodNN4M1tru+WJSsyYJ0ZqV@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20101123T030214-243@post.gmane.org>
	<20101123.113733.2059974256209184038.Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@umons.ac.be>
	<066401cb8b28$a46a1740$ed3e45c0$@com>
	<loom.20101123T190142-212@post.gmane.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 haskell:01 command-line:01 ocaml:01 edwin:98 wrote:01 caml-list:01 writes:01 parameter:02 parameters:03 restriction:05 restriction:05 performs:06 tue:06 benchmarks:07 

On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:03:10 +0000 (UTC)
Isaac Gouy <igouy2@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop <at> googlemail.com> writes:
> 
> > 
> > Note that the regex-dna solution for Haskell tweaks its GC
> > parameters via the -H command-line parameter:
> 
> 
> Note that there is no restriction on "tuning the GC" for regex-dna.
> 
> Note that there is no restriction on "tuning the GC" for any task
> except binary-trees.

Sounds good. Then Ocaml could still win if it performs well on the
other benchmarks.

Best regards,
--Edwin