From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77836BBAF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:26:28 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvICAEIg7UzAbSoIYGdsb2JhbACUUTGOBwsfJQQevkKFRwQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,250,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="68005895" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 23:25:41 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from localhost (okapi.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.117]) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id oAOMPeWL011607 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:25:40 +0100 Received: from e178026121.adsl.alicedsl.de (e178026121.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.26.121]) by webmail.in-berlin.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20101124232540.11036ng75g6gbdgk@webmail.in-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:25:40 +0100 From: "Oliver Bandel" To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? References: <361805.43543.qm@web120503.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <43F4B91B-06EE-4811-95CC-689AB6093A59@univ-orleans.fr> In-Reply-To: <43F4B91B-06EE-4811-95CC-689AB6093A59@univ-orleans.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; bandel:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 univ-orleans:01 beginner's:01 ocaml:01 bug:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 poverty:98 beginners:01 beginners:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 halting problem discovered practically ;) Zitat von "David Rajchenbach-Teller" : > Hey, guys. > Time to stop this, please. > > Thanks, > David > > On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Isaac Gouy wrote: > >> Ed Keith yahoo.com> writes: >> >>>>> I am not asking WHAT the rules are but a JUSTIFICATION >>>> for them (which you >>>>> have been incapable of providing so far). >>>> >>>> I feel no need to provide a JUSTIFICATION to you for >>>> anything. >>>> >>> >>> Am I to interpret this to mean that the rules are purely arbitrary and >> capricious with no though behind them? >> >> Tendentious. >> >> A great deal of thought has been given to all aspects of the =20 >> benchmarks game. >> >>> I hope I am misinterpreting this statement, but can think of no other >> interpretation >> >> Poverty of imagination. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: >> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list >> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr >> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners >> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >