From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2BDBC57 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:44:47 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlcDAAsh80zAbSoIYGdsb2JhbACDUJB7jjILHyUEHrFXkCYNgRSDM3MEihY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,275,1288566000"; d="scan'208";a="81184896" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 29 Nov 2010 12:44:46 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de X-Envelope-To: Received: from first (e178028169.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.28.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id oATBikMc008653 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:44:46 +0100 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D8B25441BD3; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:44:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:44:45 +0100 From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de To: "'Caml List'" Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? Message-ID: <20101129114445.GA4859@siouxsie> References: <20101123232742.GC28768@siouxsie> <4CF12ABF.7010803@univ-savoie.fr> <20101128181748.GB1689@siouxsie> <4CF35735.1070400@univ-savoie.fr> <094801cb8fb8$2f7ebaa0$8e7c2fe0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <094801cb8fb8$2f7ebaa0$8e7c2fe0$@com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 X-Spam: no; 0.00; in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 cheers:01 christophe:01 raffalli:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 0100,:01 christophe:01 raffalli:01 ocaml's:01 runtime:01 beginner's:01 bug:01 chablais:01 yes. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:25:52AM -0000, Jon Harrop wrote: > I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem! > > Cheers, > Jon. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list- > > bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Christophe Raffalli > > Sent: 29 November 2010 07:33 > > To: oliver@first.in-berlin.de > > Cc: Caml List > > Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Is OCaml fast? > > > > Le 28/11/2010 19:17, oliver@first.in-berlin.de a écrit : > > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:58:55PM +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >>> To the extent that this rule is the same for all languages and that > > most > > >>> languages on the shootout are also garbage collected, I think > > OCaml's > > >>> problem with this benchmark do point at a weakness of the current > > >>> GC code. > > >> This is untrue ... the bintree example, is just bad in OCaml because > > the > > >> default > > >> value of the minor heap size is the correct value for reactive > > programs > > >> where you want fast minor GC slice, because they interrupt the > > program ... > > > [...] > > > > > > And if your program contains both kinds of functionality? > > > What possible solution would you recommend? > > > > Changing the value of the minor heap size at runtime ... > > There is no pb with this ... > > > > > > > > > > > Ciao, > > > Oliver > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > > > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > > > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > > > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > > > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > > > > -- > > Christophe Raffalli > > Universite de Savoie > > Batiment Le Chablais, bureau 21 > > 73376 Le Bourget-du-Lac Cedex > > > > tel: (33) 4 79 75 81 03 > > fax: (33) 4 79 75 87 42 > > mail: Christophe.Raffalli@univ-savoie.fr > > www: http://www.lama.univ-savoie.fr/~RAFFALLI > > --------------------------------------------- > > IMPORTANT: this mail is signed using PGP/MIME > > At least Enigmail/Mozilla, mutt or evolution > > can check this signature. The public key is > > stored on www.keyserver.net > > --------------------------------------------- > >