From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96C3BC57
	for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Wed,  1 Dec 2010 10:15:42 +0100 (CET)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlQBAB6h9UzAbSoIe2dsb2JhbACDUJ9BFQEBFiIEHrMWkGYNgRSDM3ME
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,282,1288566000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="90468103"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Dec 2010 10:15:42 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Received: from first (e178035219.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.35.219])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id oB19FfbV009512
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:15:41 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 70584441BAF; Wed,  1 Dec 2010 10:15:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:15:41 +0100
From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Tips to find the cause of a seg fault
Message-ID: <20101201091541.GA3917@siouxsie>
References: <AANLkTik4n=XgNhA6SsQXV_ZvQSsPrQFFYjPQaqSNnYKn@mail.gmail.com>
 <20101130231804.GB21723@siouxsie>
 <AANLkTi=aojt+6GvZUPL7a2T+0doddQWUMfSC-XxZKKyX@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=aojt+6GvZUPL7a2T+0doddQWUMfSC-XxZKKyX@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
X-Spam: no; 0.00; in-berlin:01 0100,:01 segfault:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 behaves:02 opengl:03 fault:04 dec:05 wed:06 actually:10 example:10 philippe:11 

Hi,


On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:32:16AM +0100, Philippe Veber wrote:
> Actually I was not confident I could extract a small program reproducing the
> issue until ... you had me try ! I could get a very tiny example that
> behaves exactly the same, which does not involve opengl at all, only sdl.
> Here it is :
[...]


After installing some sdl-related packages, I could comopile the code.
So far it does not crash.

What actions do create the segfault for you?


Ciao,
   Oliver