From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC753BBAF for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:54:37 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgFAESoDk1QRFuw/2dsb2JhbACWCY4Xc7xvhUoE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,201,1291590000"; d="scan'208";a="84425727" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 20 Dec 2010 09:54:37 +0100 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUbVs-0005Bz-Ov; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:54:36 +0000 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:54:36 +0000 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: oliver@first.in-berlin.de Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml-tutorial.org is down Message-ID: <20101220085436.GA19918@annexia.org> References: <20101220065055.839fdd7b.mle+ocaml@mega-nerd.com> <20101219234718.GA6086@annexia.org> <20101220010332.GA8023@siouxsie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101220010332.GA8023@siouxsie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam: no; 0.00; 0100,:01 in-berlin:01 ocaml:01 yup:01 rebuilt:01 20,:98 20,:98 scare:98 scare:98 wrote:01 wrote:01 oliver:01 caml-list:01 rebuild:03 seems:03 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:03:32AM +0100, oliver@first.in-berlin.de wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:47:18PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 06:50:55AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Hi all (and particularly Richard Jones), > > > > > > The Ocaml tutorial site seems to be down. > > > > Yup, sorry, we'll have it up in a few days. Because of the recent > > exim scare I thought it wise to rebuild that machine. > [...] > > Hmhhh what exim scare? > An exploit? > > Why not just updateing the machine, or if no updates are available, just eremove exim?! The machine was not exploited, nor do we suspect that it was. However upgrading exim has necessitated removing the cocanwiki Debian package, and now it has to be rebuilt. Keep calm and carry on ... Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat