From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBNJjuEd017930
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:45:56 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtECABQ1E03AbSoIe2dsb2JhbACDZJItjhoVAQEWIgQgsGeQVg2BE4M2dAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,220,1291590000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="84647578"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Dec 2010 20:45:50 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Received: from first (e178024157.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.24.157])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id oBNJjnOV030469
	for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:45:49 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 54CB044221B; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:45:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:45:48 +0100
From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20101223194548.GA2452@siouxsie>
References: <20101222193907.GA8091@siouxsie>
 <1293061753.22147.517.camel@thinkpad>
 <20101223135228.GA3651@siouxsie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101223135228.GA3651@siouxsie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocamlnet and sending Referrer

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 02:52:28PM +0100, oliver@first.in-berlin.de wrote:
[...]
> 
> Hmhhh
> 
> strange,  I get syntax errors with the following:

It's not strange.

Strange is that I didn't saw the problem ;)

> 
> ===========================================================
> module Networking =
>   struct
>     open Pcre
> 
>     open Http_client
> 
>     let call = new get "http://www.ocaml.org" in
>     (call # request_header `Base) # update_field "Referer" "foobar";
[...]

Inside that module call it at toplevel, and therefore the "in" is nonsense
of course, or I had to encapsulate that stuff inside a function.

So, thanks Gerd for hinting me to the Pipeline-stuff,
and sorry for the traffic.

Ciao,
   Oliver