From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2OGqZni031533 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:52:35 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcDAAcUi01beRpVe2dsb2JhbAClSRQBARYmBCHCaoVpBIxv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,237,1299452400"; d="scan'208";a="91063077" Received: from givry.fdupont.fr ([91.121.26.85]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Mar 2011 17:51:58 +0100 Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2OGpuSK090082; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:51:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr) Message-Id: <201103241651.p2OGpuSK090082@givry.fdupont.fr> From: Francis Dupont To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jehan_Pag=E8s?= cc: caml-list In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:17:37 +0900. Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:51:56 +0100 Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml and cryptography This is not the first study about crypto implementation speeds. Usually the winner for heavily used algorithms is OpenSSL, BTW not because it is well written but simply because it is optmized in assembly for common platforms (including SSE* & co on x86). Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr