From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p399XjhM019726 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 11:33:45 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AncFAC4noE3RVdY2kGdsb2JhbACZBo0NCBQBAQEBCQkNBxQEIYh6G58NimiCI4Q4MIhdAQEDBoVoBIVUiAOEZYRTOg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,329,1299452400"; d="scan'208";a="96615680" Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 09 Apr 2011 11:33:39 +0200 Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6338399bwz.27 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:33:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AQL8sWKDG/xD6f/A02eHQeD5Gl86WUEjZ3SUqed3j8o=; b=AVCP0LsNB3OVaTWI5CqqwNNpFyph/Q8MtGYqHA80vzXfwDnDoLnpAJDOLg7y82Z6Ii Zn+bnHe5VXoO5Wzg6LfzJaxmkS8CIRYrWg79HrwprVIT50vtp1Ogy5bm/Ij0684zHRUJ QDnopMBdI5cOkE2dEQRplb0meijr1xBXYWzIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fGEOWow2hGSiDYPjWfdmoPUGAM6V6Ygl8syXvCLzRvghwaCmTr5uGTZwfdPy/UXFRz 4IAKq9YfI57yNCwXElOQUlTPE5kJEXaqvwMIm7kqby468qtuJaHhAQXRT7PtiQjYFSRf iTtoRZQrZ7QcB7YTbY5obET2+V/k7b7OC8f9Y= Received: by 10.204.233.14 with SMTP id jw14mr370921bkb.40.1302341617728; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lemon.local.tld (191-96-133-95.pool.ukrtel.net [95.133.96.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w3sm2079117bkt.17.2011.04.09.02.33.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Apr 2011 02:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 12:33:12 +0300 From: ygrek To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-Id: <20110409123312.c464b15c.ygrekheretix@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D9D95E5.1040701@motion-twin.com> References: <4D9D95E5.1040701@motion-twin.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Missing stack frames On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:45:57 +0200 Nicolas Cannasse wrote: > I noticed that it was caused by an exception raised from a CMXA library > that was not compiled with -g. That would not be a big issue since I > don't want to debug the library itself but a lot of my software stack > frames was also removed. > > Is it a known issue ? I have reported similar issue at http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5074 Trivia: noticed it when using extlib from debian which was (still is?) compiled without -g -- ygrek http://ygrek.org.ua