From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p44E5HFu031657
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:05:17 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0GAKpcwU1c8w3B/2dsb2JhbACYSI1Qd4hyvFSGBwSdcQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,314,1301868000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="98702231"
Received: from dangi.happyleptic.org ([92.243.13.193])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 04 May 2011 16:05:12 +0200
Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan)
	by dangi with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1QHcj4-0002RP-10
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:06:50 +0200
Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1QHchO-0001Ib-Jy
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:05:06 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 16:05:06 +0200
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20110504140506.GB2268@ccellier.rd.happyleptic.org>
References: <4DC10444.1060104@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DC10444.1060104@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Survey on OCaml usage/needs in the industry

> we would be interested to
> hear about the reasons why your company chose OCaml for developing
> software

What about a survey about why our companies chose _not_ to use OCaml ?
Wouldn't be useful as well ?