From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pB69VibU022046 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:31:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAEPg3U7V+6tl/2dsb2JhbABEqluBBYFyAQEFOk8LRhQoSId1BrUHBIgagjVjBJRlkiI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,304,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="122195440" Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 06 Dec 2011 10:31:38 +0100 Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RXrVo-0004rf-P1 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:40:32 +0100 Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RXrN7-0005UC-50 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:31:33 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:31:33 +0100 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20111206093133.GB16273@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> References: <1B0D83BD-1902-4F7C-B3FB-B759122D6AB9@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1B0D83BD-1902-4F7C-B3FB-B759122D6AB9@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml maintenance status / community fork So what your proposition adds to the existing ocaml forks out there is that there should be people reviewing and merging incoming patches and releasing a semi-official community version for each official release. The problem with this proposition as stated, in my opinion, is that the original fork is very easy to do but the following review/release processes asks for more volunteers time. Why not concentrate on a fork that's already there with plenty of patches, for instance this one : https://github.com/thelema/ocaml-community and roll a first release out of it ?