From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBACd7JW015185 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:39:07 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0BAJtR407UGyoEkWdsb2JhbABDqnwiAQEBAQkLCwcUAyKBcgEBBAE6RAsLNBIUKCGIGwK1JosKYwSUcJIp X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,331,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="122845247" Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2011 13:39:01 +0100 Received: from ombreroze.happyleptic.org (unknown [82.229.213.209]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071374C846C for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:38:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from rixed by ombreroze.happyleptic.org with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RZMCb-0001cL-Ht for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:38:53 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:38:53 +0100 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: caml-list Message-ID: <20111210123853.GA5107@ombreroze.happyleptic.org> References: <4EE34F56.8010709@glondu.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EE34F56.8010709@glondu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why isn't there a common platform for functional language interaction ? > I think that to achieve better > interoperability and "hype", one of those would be a better fit than the > current native and bytecode compilers. Next year is going to be exciting with so many people commiting themselves to develop all these additions to the compiler ! :-)