From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBADsVmO016544
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:54:31 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au8BABRk407AbSoIe2dsb2JhbABDhQeldSIBARYmBCGBcgEBBSNWEAsJDwICJgICFBhEiAqjZpEiFIEghx+CBDNjBI04hziSKQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,331,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="134833964"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Dec 2011 14:54:28 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from first (e178013058.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.13.58])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id pBADsQce018160
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:54:26 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1FEF31540359; Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:54:26 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 14:54:26 +0100
From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: rixed@happyleptic.org
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20111210135426.GA5401@siouxsie>
References: <CAHqiZ-+bDbKmakxt+f9P-FwMbwVcoYaaaUO2B_gQbqygfmfbgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4EE34F56.8010709@glondu.net>
 <20111210123853.GA5107@ombreroze.happyleptic.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111210123853.GA5107@ombreroze.happyleptic.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why isn't there a common platform for functional
 language interaction ?

On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 01:38:53PM +0100, rixed@happyleptic.org wrote:
> > I think that to achieve better
> > interoperability and "hype", one of those would be a better fit than the
> > current native and bytecode compilers.
> 
> Next year is going to be exciting with so many people commiting themselves
> to develop all these additions to the compiler ! :-)
[...]

A lot of people think, next year (2012) will be the end of the world.

But there is no proof for this so far.
Not even a reason. Only the maya calendar's value overflow.

But maybe you have found the explanation for it, so we all will be doomed. ;-)


Ciao,
   Oliver