From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBFJKc9s000564
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:20:39 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEAANI6k7RVde2kGdsb2JhbABDqgcDgSQIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgXIBAQEDARICJgYBGx4DAQsGBQspEiECEQEFARwZFA6HWAKbVAqLZYJrhQhAiHECBQuIX4MaBI09hzgBhwKDa4MJPYN6
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,359,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="123556524"
Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 15 Dec 2011 20:20:22 +0100
Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so4011575eaa.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:20:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=k+u/03iAD78FL8MAsco99/Em8O/7ANqaO9SuXE7hH7s=;
        b=P719ejb0nidtyODPSMckFve4XKaYkM4mLvLiGnSTsVV2jR39jxHILzhAEZwiU/cq9v
         5xOxTbNySPuHiEyKKK7akeCMPwosUa519vOLZ7U10WWr1fk0NtFeHczkIMiJGvZ3ZFox
         /Ox3XxLt95Ds76gAKHJzExDr0D4NkhRfLB4l8=
Received: by 10.205.137.144 with SMTP id io16mr2163544bkc.23.1323976821856;
        Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cherry.local.tld ([213.169.93.209])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j9sm17233889bkd.2.2011.12.15.11.20.19
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:20:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:20:21 +0200
From: ygrek <ygrekheretix@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-Id: <20111215212021.76bd8501e63bc7c6f95aa4b8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EE7547F.9030806@gmail.com>
References: <4EE5EF49.80108@frisch.fr>
	<4EE5F883.2020103@gmail.com>
	<4EE7547F.9030806@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About the "mingw" port of OCaml

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500
Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated 
> testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments.  Batteries is 
> definitely benefiting from ygrek's jenkins/hudson server[1] (although it 
> must have stopped sending me emails again, as batteries HEAD is unhappy 
> and I didn't get notification).
> 
> ygrek: could you use more build slaves?

Sure I could, but I do not have extra hardware resources. Also setting up ocaml
on windows is a daunting and frustrating exercise, especially so because some 
other libs are needed too (pcre, camomile, etc).

Concerning the mail notifications - there are no errors in the logs - maybe the
mails land in gmail's spam folder? And btw if anybody wants to add some project to
build (without (many) dependencies) and/or receive notifications - please tell.

-- 
 ygrek
 http://ygrek.org.ua