From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBHLVUUj010358
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:31:30 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsIEALEJ7U5KfVM2kGdsb2JhbABDqicDgSYIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgXIBAQEDARICJgYBGx4DAQsGBQspEiECEQEFARwZIodYAppLCotlgmuEID+IcQIFC4hfgxoEjUSHOQGHAoNsgwo9g3s
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,369,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="123773120"
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 17 Dec 2011 22:31:25 +0100
Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so5585499eek.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:31:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=i32gRhE5kwrIBGPMVpVE5Qoh3XMeXGsbkPzYaxX2HsA=;
        b=Ere/Bk+MzTT1eJela1h1265rpgO6jrkfkuJvVkZZ1L8HSoCC1RnWlY55ku5UI4nEL6
         P2lpS3T6A5qCbzbNtRziJcivlFcn+34CCDEpQ8yX/4vhNO90f2wcvzAJD95CZnKpUC4I
         hEVcJPUReBaXBrCoUoj/W2J76T/FWGWjR/9e8=
Received: by 10.14.149.13 with SMTP id w13mr1764735eej.61.1324157484954;
        Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:31:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cherry.local.tld ([213.169.92.158])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z54sm20505967eeh.5.2011.12.17.13.31.23
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 17 Dec 2011 13:31:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:31:24 +0200
From: ygrek <ygrekheretix@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-Id: <20111217233124.d19073268d3c5b4ef1f66e1f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL-jcAn0Gy7j0tKn7E-366zTbAGtu3ioguAYAsYBRznyysJHfg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4EE5EF49.80108@frisch.fr>
	<4EE5F883.2020103@gmail.com>
	<4EE7547F.9030806@gmail.com>
	<20111215212021.76bd8501e63bc7c6f95aa4b8@gmail.com>
	<CAL-jcAkt7grC0z7_dVj7zD846zhHdPjWpHZZeCw_m1iEoBf4Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL-jcAn0Gy7j0tKn7E-366zTbAGtu3ioguAYAsYBRznyysJHfg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About the "mingw" port of OCaml

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:52:39 -0500
Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do all the jenkins build slaves have to be in the same place?  I assumed it
> was possible to add remote systems to a jenkins server as build hosts.  If
> this isn't possible, maybe there's someone who wants to contribute to
> better testing of OCaml packages willing to increase your electricity bill
> by sending you some hardware.  :)

Ah, I misunderstood you. Of course build slaves can be located anywhere on the internet.
That's how it works already.

-- 
 ygrek
 http://ygrek.org.ua