From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBP3BgLi019499
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:11:42 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4BAMGT9k7AbSoIe2dsb2JhbABDhQ+nLCIBARYmBCGBcgEBBSNWEAsJEQIZDQICFBgxiA+lW5BxE4EciUozYwSNR4c6kjY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,406,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="136768512"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 25 Dec 2011 04:11:37 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from first (e178023095.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.23.95])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id pBP3BYPB023931
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:11:35 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 76C1B154036A; Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:11:34 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 04:11:34 +0100
From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: bobzhang <bobzhang1988@gmail.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20111225031134.GF1752@siouxsie>
References: <jd5hof$u3o$1@dough.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <jd5hof$u3o$1@dough.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Need help for a practical hacking book about ocaml

Hello,

On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 04:55:26PM -0500, bobzhang wrote:
[...]
>  My book mainly focus on how to make ocaml programmers more productive,
> quite different from other existing books.
[...]

A good idea.

[...]
>  I have been digging haskell, ocaml, lisp for several years, honestly
> speaking, I found ocaml is still the most productive language.
[...]

You could put the above paragraph into the preface.
And mention, that even you found OCaml to be the most
productive language, you even want to become more productive,
and that was the reason for your book... (that's what I understood).

Maybe you could elaborate a littlebid more about why you
think that OCaml is most productive.
It's of course also my conclusion from looking at a lot of languages.
But you might be better in explaining it.

You asked for help.
Can you specify more detailed, which kind of help you are looking for?

Ciao,
   Oliver