From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q0VDacJA017501
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:38 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkICAI7tJ0/AbSoIe2dsb2JhbABEhQupVSIBARYmBCGBcgEBBSNWEAsJDwICJgICFBgxE4d/pwSRehOBHIloAgIdBAYBLgQPAwOEDw0FBIJDM2MEjVuHRJJW
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,596,1320620400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="129545661"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 31 Jan 2012 14:36:33 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from first (e178013244.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.13.244])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id q0VDaV03023288
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:32 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9DC81154036F; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:36:31 +0100
From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Adrien <camaradetux@gmail.com>
Cc: Pierre Vittet <pierre.vittet@inria.fr>, caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20120131133631.GA1875@siouxsie>
References: <471204069.596560.1327958835658.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr>
 <1898845183.596573.1327958954685.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr>
 <20120131100224.GA4413@siouxsie>
 <CAP5QFJn3ozfsmOooQF2bjF1F-3nNydAQ99oEDkFA9nMomGOwXA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAP5QFJn3ozfsmOooQF2bjF1F-3nNydAQ99oEDkFA9nMomGOwXA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Vim plugin

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Adrien wrote:
> On 31/01/2012, oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> > Sometimes I had problems with syntax highlighting in OCaml.
> > The end of comments was not always displayed correctly colored.
> > This was the case, when long and nested comments were used.
> > Then the non-comment section sometimes was displayed as
> > if it were a comment.
> >
> > Someone also knows that problem?
> >
> > Maybe that is another issue that you might be able and interested
> > to fix...?!
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I've had the issue with long comments too but I think it's not
> specific to the ocaml highlighting: if you move around (forcing some
> kind of refresh when doing so), you will probably recover the proper
> highlighting (gg'' might be enough).
[...]

Yes, I sometimes scrolled down and up or vice versa and it solved the problem.
But this can become annoying...

Ciao,
   Oliver