From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8E67ED26 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:37:39 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAE7j0U/V+6tl/2dsb2JhbABFtE6BB4IZAQU6PxALRhQoIS6HdLkbkEZgA5Udj3yCYg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,737,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="147020682" Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 08 Jun 2012 13:37:39 +0200 Received: from extranet.securactive.org ([82.234.213.170] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan) by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Scxzg-0004p3-4S; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:08:44 +0200 Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ScxVT-0007TL-Tf; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:37:32 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:37:31 +0200 From: rixed@happyleptic.org To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20120608113731.GA27617@securactive.lan> References: <48BE1C34-0459-4E72-AD89-8DABD92CAD5F@inria.fr> <20120606122617.GC20219@securactive.lan> <20120606205229.GA11065@annexia.org> <20120608045503.GA8094@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> <20120608072030.GO3716@annexia.org> <20120608090230.GA12183@securactive.lan> <20120608105518.GA16700@annexia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120608105518.GA16700@annexia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Beta release of OCaml 4.00.0 Ok so I've just created the retired-camels organization in github, with a fork of Benedikt mirror, and then cherry picked the two commits you mentioned above the 4.00 branch (in a branch named ppc64). I've done as well with the mips commits. Could you please check that this ppc64 branch works on ppc64? I will check as well the mips branch in a few days. When both are OK we should merge them into a a 'more-arch' branch that we'll just have to rebase regularly, until a better solution emerge.