From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 608CB7ED26 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsKAFXq0U9QRFuw/2dsb2JhbABFsxwDgS+BB4IYAQEFOj8QCxgcEhQoNBuHdLkehUuFW1iCD4I5YAOVHY98gmE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,737,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="147024283" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 08 Jun 2012 14:07:10 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Scxy9-0004Z9-TY; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 13:07:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:07:09 +0100 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: rixed@happyleptic.org Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20120608120709.GC16700@annexia.org> References: <48BE1C34-0459-4E72-AD89-8DABD92CAD5F@inria.fr> <20120606122617.GC20219@securactive.lan> <20120606205229.GA11065@annexia.org> <20120608045503.GA8094@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> <20120608072030.GO3716@annexia.org> <20120608090230.GA12183@securactive.lan> <20120608105518.GA16700@annexia.org> <20120608113731.GA27617@securactive.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120608113731.GA27617@securactive.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Beta release of OCaml 4.00.0 On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 01:37:31PM +0200, rixed@happyleptic.org wrote: > Ok so I've just created the retired-camels organization in github, > with a fork of Benedikt mirror, and then cherry picked the two > commits you mentioned above the 4.00 branch (in a branch named > ppc64). I've done as well with the mips commits. > > Could you please check that this ppc64 branch works on ppc64? > I will check as well the mips branch in a few days. When both are > OK we should merge them into a a 'more-arch' branch that we'll > just have to rebase regularly, until a better solution emerge. Will do later. Note that the -lpthread patch has just been accepted & committed upstream. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat