From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110D07ED26 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:05:47 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgsKADWB009QRFuw/2dsb2JhbABFsycDgTCBB4IYAQEFOj8QCxgcEhQoNIgPt22FS4VcXoFwgjtgA5UdgROOaYJh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,743,1330902000"; d="scan'208";a="147123811" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 09 Jun 2012 19:05:46 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdP6f-0008TQ-J6; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:05:45 +0100 Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 18:05:45 +0100 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: rixed@happyleptic.org Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20120609170545.GB11065@annexia.org> References: <48BE1C34-0459-4E72-AD89-8DABD92CAD5F@inria.fr> <20120609050957.GA25625@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120609050957.GA25625@yeeloong.happyleptic.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Beta release of OCaml 4.00.0 On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:09:58AM +0200, rixed@happyleptic.org wrote: > > The release of OCaml version 4.00.0 is approaching. We have > > created a beta version for your testing pleasure. Please > > download the sources, compile, install, and test your favourite > > software with it. Then let me know what happened, one way or > > the other. > > The first failure I got is from oUnit setup.ml which attempt to > scanf "%S %S@\n", but using the @ after a %S (not %s) does not > work the same as in 3.12.1 : it looks for a '@' instead of interpreting > it as a scanning indication. > The manual says that scanning indications are for %s and %[range], > so it seams setup.ml is to blame, though. I just discovered the same problem. Unfortunately ounit is a build requirement for many OCaml packages, so this blocks a large part of the rebuild. Is this an OCaml bug, or just a change in functionality? Has a Mantis report been filed? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat