From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69407EC10 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:57:54 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMLS4k9QRFuw/2dsb2JhbABFtVaBB4IYAQEEATo/BQsLDgocEhQoISeHcgm5ZIVKhWSFPWADlSmQAoJg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,449,1336341600"; d="scan'208";a="163828611" Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 21 Jun 2012 09:57:54 +0200 Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShcH3-0005eZ-AA; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:57:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:57:53 +0100 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" To: Jeffrey Scofield Cc: Caml List Message-ID: <20120621075753.GA21707@annexia.org> References: <20120620074533.GA5827@annexia.org> <9BD38C00-4929-40A6-B13E-AC5403F998D8@psellos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9BD38C00-4929-40A6-B13E-AC5403F998D8@psellos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml on Amazon EC2 Instance On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:45:24AM -0700, Jeffrey Scofield wrote: > However, it also includes configuration info for EPEL 6, disabled by > default. I enabled the EPEL repository and was really hoping OCaml > would be in there. There are quite a few OCaml libraries in the EPEL > repository, but OCaml itself isn't there. EPEL is a repository that adds additional community-supported packages to RHEL. RHEL itself includes OCaml, so it's normal for EPEL not to have OCaml, but to have several additional libraries for OCaml. It sounds to me as if "Amazon Linux" is broken, or you need to enable something. > While googling I read about the Optional channel of Red Hat. As > far as I can determine, this is part of RHN, a subscriber service. > Is this right? Yes. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat