From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rich@annexia.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F09E7F249
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:09:52 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rich@annexia.org) identity=pra; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  rich@annexia.org designates 80.68.91.176 as permitted sender)
  identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="rich@annexia.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=80.68.91.176;
  receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rich@annexia.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@furbychan.cocan.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkUQAEC0j1BQRFuw/2dsb2JhbABEhS8jhhq2RQSBAIEIgh4BAQU6TwsYHBIUKIg+rESQL4VPUIVWNoMDgkNhA5VzkEOCbw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,679,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="160871104"
Received: from furbychan.cocan.org ([80.68.91.176])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 30 Oct 2012 12:09:52 +0100
Received: from rich by furbychan.cocan.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rich@annexia.org>)
	id 1TT9hf-0003NQ-EY
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:51 +0000
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:09:51 +0000
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rich@annexia.org>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20121030110951.GC12862@annexia.org>
References: <20121030110028.GA12862@annexia.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121030110028.GA12862@annexia.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] -warn-error question

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:00:28AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> Why does this disable warning 23:
> 
>   -warn-error -23+CDEFLMPSUVYZX
> 
> whereas this seems not to have any effect on warning 23:
> 
>   -warn-error CDEFLMPSUVYZX-23

But wait!  Neither disables warning 23, or there's something
stochastic going on.

What's the correct syntax to change my current warn-error:

 -warn-error CDEFLMPSUVYZX

into one which is exactly the same except that warning 23 is ignored?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones
Red Hat