From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rixed@happyleptic.org>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC417EEAF
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:16:55 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=pra;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  rixed@happyleptic.org) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@eneide.happyleptic.org) identity=helo;
  client-ip=213.251.171.101;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="rixed@happyleptic.org";
  x-sender="postmaster@eneide.happyleptic.org";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAP1cAVHV+6tl/2dsb2JhbABEvkgWc4IfAQU6TwshJQ8FKCGIMb4ZkBphA5YLkEmCeQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,530,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="191390240"
Received: from eneide.happyleptic.org ([213.251.171.101])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 24 Jan 2013 17:16:55 +0100
Received: from extranet.securactive.net ([82.240.34.113] helo=ccellier.rd.securactive.lan)
	by eneide.happyleptic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1TyPUg-000327-P2
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:17:38 +0100
Received: from rixed by ccellier.rd.securactive.lan with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <rixed@happyleptic.org>)
	id 1TyPTt-0000oE-RO
	for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:16:49 +0100
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:16:49 +0100
From: rixed@happyleptic.org
To: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Message-ID: <20130124161649.GB2290@securactive.lan>
References: <510145A5.6030807@frisch.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <510145A5.6030807@frisch.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Working Group: the future of syntax extensions in
 OCaml, after camlp4

Are we interrested here striclty in _pre_processing or is runtime code
generation also on topic?