From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gesbert@antislash.info>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E017F20B
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:20:18 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  gesbert@antislash.info) identity=pra; client-ip=212.227.17.9;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gesbert@antislash.info";
  x-sender="gesbert@antislash.info";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  gesbert@antislash.info) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=212.227.17.9;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gesbert@antislash.info";
  x-sender="gesbert@antislash.info";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  postmaster@moutng.kundenserver.de designates 212.227.17.9 as
  permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=212.227.17.9;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gesbert@antislash.info";
  x-sender="postmaster@moutng.kundenserver.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoBAAolGlHU4xEJfGdsb2JhbABEhUS7bxYOAQELCQsHFAUkgh8BAQQBfgsLRleIJQqvDZAMiQSFWYMqA4gwhS2cIQ
X-IPAS-Result: AhoBAAolGlHU4xEJfGdsb2JhbABEhUS7bxYOAQELCQsHFAUkgh8BAQQBfgsLRleIJQqvDZAMiQSFWYMqA4gwhS2cIQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,648,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1917149"
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 12 Feb 2013 12:09:37 +0100
Received: from agaric.localnet (jua06-3-88-189-115-104.fbx.proxad.net [88.189.115.104])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mreu1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0Lla4p-1UfNfq2Xw7-00b0bN; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:20:17 +0100
From: Louis Gesbert <gesbert@antislash.info>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:20:16 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <201302081625.29881.louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com> <511A1C84.8010605@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <511A1C84.8010605@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201302121220.16247.gesbert@antislash.info>
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:+2g0MCZeIrPaGq2zBY5hecZ+akOwH5iPPWTavypYuRT
 PNRoe7/oH0X0gzpR5O4embYckWvQNsvF0AXSHiD4xei3W8uNKk
 w/xxFT4cRrcDubzTO3wlCLFDqc/4xh2sxE2/fYdZUdEKwJL+vL
 NDXfQm4B8kcD4DQz1XTECu0okYB1lctKaCUwZ+cAl7DjdrZbg+
 NF10/Y9yV3QyfjUO5U5Y2iII9NejJVXTxA4kq0zWCzWT5f0dvn
 PRODjVfnr5hPDSaObOUhQLIA/Wmll3JZaq+2ZSbrzO/NlZ4IzZ
 6zaB2ySg5Rn/1/dKkcdgR/avATrD2Q2ZeiNBjncyHvn1qK6t/T
 qRwNh0fKjGJRIOZe6gn0EMoox5OVqBvnNo4KG6LyG
X-Validation-by: gesbert@antislash.info
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocp-indent beta release

> Why is the choice of tuareg-mode wired-in?
> Is is possible to use ocp-indent on top of the default caml-mode?

Hmm, good remark, there is no real reason for that except that we use tuareg-
mode. I'll see how to remove this dependency from our emacs script.

Thanks for the feedback,

--
Louis Gesbert, OCamlPro