Re: [Caml-list] ocp-indent 1.0.0 release

[Louis Gesbert <louis.gesbert@ocamlpro.com>]

You can use the --lines option for that purpose: it will assume that all lines 
not in the interval are correctly indented, and indent the lines in the 
interval relative to that (to some extent, see 
https://github.com/OCamlPro/ocp-indent/issues/39).

In your example, you could use '--lines 2-'

However, that supposes that the block you submit is more or less syntactically 
correct. You can also submit the whole file with '--lines <current-line>' to 
guarantee the syntax but indent only the current line; that is how it is done 
in the emacs mode when you press TAB.

Don't hesitate to submit on https://github.com/OCamlPro/ocp-
indent/issues?state=open for further discussion if you are reluctant on 
spamming the caml-list.

--
Louis, OCamlPro

Le Sunday 17 February 2013 19:30:51, Török Edwin a écrit :
> On 02/17/2013 08:05 PM, Raphael Proust wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Niki Yoshiuchi <aplusbi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The second thing I've noticed is that "=" indents only relative to the
> >> selected text.  In other words, if I have
> >> 
> >> 
> >> let my_fun f =
> >> . . let nested_fun g =
> >> . . . . (* content *)
> >> . . . . (* more content *)
> >> 
> >> and I hit "=" while the cursor is on the third line I end up with:
> >> 
> >> let my_fun f =
> >> . . let nested_fun g =
> >> (* content *)
> >> . . . . (* more content *)
> >> 
> >> Doing something like "ggVG=" will properly indent the text.
> > 
> > This is the expected behaviour. ocp-indent is only given the selected
> > text and thus can only work correctly when receiving complete blocks.
> > (Indentation is relative to the first line of the chunk that is
> > passed.)
> 
> Could ocp-indent consider the indentation of the first line to be correct
> when it is working on incomplete blocks, and indent everything in relation
> to that? i.e. call ocp-indent with a new flag --incomplete, and if first
> line got 2 spaces, then have the starting indentation be 2 spaces, and
> then increase/decrease indentation relative to that. That seems how vim's
> '=' works for other languages, or without ocp-indent.
> 
> Best regards,
> --Edwin