From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51EA97F30A for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:41:18 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,822,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="6425879" Received: from adijon-153-1-29-40.w83-203.abo.wanadoo.fr (HELO alcazar) ([83.203.200.40]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 11 Mar 2013 12:41:17 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:38:23 +0100 From: Maxence Guesdon To: caml-list@inria.fr Message-ID: <20130311123823.6761f2c4@alcazar> In-Reply-To: <87036D5B-C968-4425-9C6C-04FF45466739@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> References: <87036D5B-C968-4425-9C6C-04FF45466739@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp> Organization: INRIA X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Record field disambiguation in 4.01 On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 10:24:16 +0900 Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > ... > Just to clarify: warning 41 is off by default. > You should just decide whether you want to enable it for core or not. > (The practice of using -w A -warn-error A is dangerous, as new warnings > may be added at any time) Maybe additional aliases with a naming convention could be useful, e.g. -w 4.01-A could mean "all flags as defined in 4.01 release" ? -- Maxence