From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3147EE80; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:32 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=pra; client-ip=192.109.42.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de"; x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.109.42.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de"; x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de) identity=helo; client-ip=192.109.42.8; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de"; x-sender="postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmQJAOogQ1HAbSoIiWdsb2JhbABDiDi3RYUTAwGBbBYOAQEBFRIUBCSCKgEBBSNWEAsJBQoCAgUhAgIPBRgxE4gUBLALknAVgQ6NFV0Hgi2BEwOOQ4gWgSCSbg X-IPAS-Result: AmQJAOogQ1HAbSoIiWdsb2JhbABDiDi3RYUTAwGBbBYOAQEBFRIUBCSCKgEBBSNWEAsJBQoCAgUhAgIPBRgxE4gUBLALknAVgQ6NFV0Hgi2BEwOOQ4gWgSCSbg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,850,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="6627942" Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Mar 2013 14:28:31 +0100 X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de Received: from first (e178037077.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.37.77]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id r2FDSUOk031719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:30 +0100 Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0434015400E6; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:28:29 +0100 From: oliver To: Jeremie Dimino Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, ocsigen@inria.fr Message-ID: <20130315132829.GG3409@siouxsie> References: <5142E780.7060806@hars.de> <20130315124345.GB3262@siouxsie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] BUG in unix.ml (was: strange errors when linking lwt.unix) On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 01:17:43PM +0000, Jeremie Dimino wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:43 PM, oliver wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:38:06AM +0000, Jeremie Dimino wrote: > >> Actually here is a way to reproduce this behavior without lwt on OSX > >> and some other systems: > > What system are you using? I didn't say it but "some other systems" > did't included Linux. I use Linux. No problems here. > > >> This will happen in any program setting a handler for SIGCHLD. > > > > I wonder if "any program setting a handler for SIGCHLD" means > > "program setting a handler for SIGCHLD", or only > > "program setting a handler for SIGCHLD, using lwt". > > The first one. So you mean, "any program", also with original OCaml's unix-module, but only on non-Linux? Ciao, Oliver