From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359A07EE80
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:41:07 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=pra;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  oliver@first.in-berlin.de) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de) identity=helo;
  client-ip=192.109.42.8;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="oliver@first.in-berlin.de";
  x-sender="postmaster@einhorn.in-berlin.de";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmEMAH0HTVHAbSoIe2dsb2JhbABDiDG4I4UTAwGBaRYOAQEWJgQkgiUBBSNWEAsJEQIFIQICDwUYMYgnBK9WkhwVgQ6NGF0Hgi0yYQOOS4gYlBA
X-IPAS-Result: AmEMAH0HTVHAbSoIe2dsb2JhbABDiDG4I4UTAwGBaRYOAQEWJgQkgiUBBSNWEAsJEQIFIQICDwUYMYgnBK9WkhwVgQ6NGF0Hgi0yYQOOS4gYlBA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,896,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="8921180"
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 23 Mar 2013 02:41:06 +0100
X-Envelope-From: oliver@first.in-berlin.de
Received: from first (e178012227.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.12.227])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id r2N1f5q6025211
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:41:05 +0100
Received: by first (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 41A5D15400E6; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:41:05 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 02:41:05 +0100
From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
Cc: "'Chet Murthy'" <murthy.chet@gmail.com>, caml-list@inria.fr
Message-ID: <20130323014105.GC3899@siouxsie>
References: <fa.e3jKyg6bl9+vTkPgypQ4ZRzEoos@ifi.uio.no>
 <01c401ce274a$785ff1e0$691fd5a0$@ffconsultancy.com>
 <29025F595E9343479E21A54CC92048AA@erratique.ch>
 <54562612.dHlMTtysyv@groupon>
 <01fc01ce2764$32e64e10$98b2ea30$@ffconsultancy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <01fc01ce2764$32e64e10$98b2ea30$@ffconsultancy.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Haskell vs OCaml

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:17:33AM -0000, Jon Harrop wrote:
[...]
> Exactly. Yaron's assertions that OCaml is highly productive, efficient and
> reliably are not universally applicable. Which raises the question of when
> they are applicable?
[...]

When using it on unixoid systems. :P


Ciao,
   Oliver