From: oliver <oliver@first.in-berlin.de>
To: Francois Berenger <berenger@riken.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] French study on security and functional languages
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 16:47:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130524144706.GG2007@siouxsie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519F1CF6.7050007@riken.jp>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 04:55:34PM +0900, Francois Berenger wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 04:02 PM, David MENTRE wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >For those reading French, ANSSI (French agency for information
> >security) published a study on security and functional languages, with
> >a set of recommendations. OCaml is apparently well studied:
> > http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/fr/anssi/publications/publications-scientifiques/autres-publications/lafosec-securite-et-langages-fonctionnels.html
>
> The document "État des lieux des langages fonctionnels"
> is interesting even out of the context of computer security.
>
> http://www.ssi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/LaFoSec_-_Etat_des_lieux_des_langages_fonctionnels.pdf
>
> PS: and, most importantly, page 55 gives good marks to OCaml
> compared to other languages (so that we can start to troll now) :-)
[...]
What about Haskell?
Did it "perform" well?
Ciao,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 7:02 David MENTRE
2013-05-24 7:55 ` Francois Berenger
2013-05-24 12:35 ` rixed
2013-05-24 14:43 ` oliver
2013-05-24 15:15 ` rixed
2013-05-27 1:18 ` Francois Berenger
2013-05-24 14:35 ` oliver
2013-05-24 14:59 ` Esther Baruk
2013-05-24 15:05 ` oliver
2013-05-24 15:18 ` David MENTRE
2013-05-24 15:36 ` Esther Baruk
2013-05-24 23:13 ` oliver
2013-05-26 14:14 ` Marek Kubica
2013-05-24 17:44 ` Pierre-Etienne Meunier
2013-05-27 8:55 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2013-05-24 14:47 ` oliver [this message]
2013-05-24 15:02 ` Johan Grande
2013-05-24 12:41 ` Olivier Levillain
2013-05-24 12:46 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2013-05-25 8:53 ` Olivier Levillain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130524144706.GG2007@siouxsie \
--to=oliver@first.in-berlin.de \
--cc=berenger@riken.jp \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).