From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DBCA7ED25 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:15:45 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of marek@xivilization.net) identity=pra; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="marek@xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of marek@xivilization.net designates 178.63.18.39 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="marek@xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@coaxial.xivilization.net) identity=helo; client-ip=178.63.18.39; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="marek@xivilization.net"; x-sender="postmaster@coaxial.xivilization.net"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4IAC9A7FGyPxIn/2dsb2JhbABagwY1EMBvCoEMFnSCJAEBBAE6BgEBOAQLCxgJJQ8SNgYTh34DCQqkMoRCAQV+gzQNiFgGjSqBJIFPLoNQlXeBaIwohSaDFA X-IPAS-Result: Al4IAC9A7FGyPxIn/2dsb2JhbABagwY1EMBvCoEMFnSCJAEBBAE6BgEBOAQLCxgJJQ8SNgYTh34DCQqkMoRCAQV+gzQNiFgGjSqBJIFPLoNQlXeBaIwohSaDFA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,714,1367964000"; d="scan'208";a="21833270" Received: from coaxial.xivilization.net ([178.63.18.39]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 21 Jul 2013 22:15:44 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xivilization.net; s=xiv; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=+y4NIvcS01/XzJtKQcFFMRsWlyr8tFtgNY7kKHkeNXg=; b=oKgDsO8ATURNwOMUlAOfnOtaZD4yxahUOhBtY3gsxQmB+mMvKLaKKZYjwhxAdSRcmO+d2givPsxWOlFYJVCPC9EFDj5o+Q4ngeGX+Iey8kvOsN+0iN4sZX24ANxvy+QH; Received: from ppp-188-174-94-36.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([188.174.94.36] helo=localhost.localdomain) by coaxial.xivilization.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V102h-0001Tu-ES for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:15:43 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:13:40 +0200 From: Marek Kubica To: caml-list Message-ID: <20130721221340.279dabbc@xivilization.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Batteries 2.1 On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 21:43:14 +0200 Florent Monnier wrote: > 2013/07/21, Gabriel Scherer wrote: > > I don't think Batteries needs bisect to compile -- I regularly build > > Batteries on systems without bisect. That should be an optional > > dependency (using for testing and development purposes), but it's > > fairly possible that the buildsystem displays a not-nice warning > > when it's missing that you considered an error. > > It's not only a "not-nice warning", > nothing is build at all. > > $ make > Build mode: shared > ocamlbuild -no-links src/batteries.cma src/batteriesHelp.cmo > src/batteriesThread.cma META src/batteries.cmxs > src/batteriesThread.cmxs > ocamlfind: Package `bisect' not found > ''ocamlfind ocamldep -package bigarray,num,str -modules > src/batInnerPervasives.ml > src/batInnerPervasives.ml.depends > Exit code 127 while executing this command: > ''ocamlfind ocamldep -package bigarray,num,str -modules > src/batInnerPervasives.ml > src/batInnerPervasives.ml.depends > Makefile:71: recipe for target `all' failed > make: *** [all] Error 127 I don't think this has to do with bisect. I don't have bisect installed either and Batteries 2.1 built just fine (except for the ocamlfind messages, but they were harmless). (On a related note, Batteries 2.1 is in Arch Linux AUR now) regards, Marek