From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B7B37ED25 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:57:43 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of madroach@gmerlin.de) identity=pra; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="madroach@gmerlin.de"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of postmaster@plane.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) identity=helo; client-ip=80.91.229.3; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gclci-caml-list@m.gmane.org"; x-sender="postmaster@plane.gmane.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlIBAHhK7FFQW+UDmWdsb2JhbABagzuMUqASlTIWDgEBAQEBCAsLBxQogiQBAQQBOkQLC0ZXGYd+AwkKCLYejSqDCYNoA5V4gWSBKop+iDo X-IPAS-Result: AlIBAHhK7FFQW+UDmWdsb2JhbABagzuMUqASlTIWDgEBAQEBCAsLBxQogiQBAQQBOkQLC0ZXGYd+AwkKCLYejSqDCYNoA5V4gWSBKop+iDo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,714,1367964000"; d="scan'208";a="26795301" Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2013 22:57:42 +0200 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V10hJ-0005z1-57 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:57:41 +0200 Received: from pd9528c65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.82.140.101]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:57:41 +0200 Received: from madroach by pd9528c65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:57:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: caml-list@inria.fr From: Christopher Zimmermann Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:57:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20130721225729.5267f17e61a6d904e8e6cc45@gmerlin.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd9528c65.dip0.t-ipconnect.de X-Newsreader: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta4 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.3) X-Validation-by: madroach@gmerlin.de Subject: [Caml-list] Re: functional or imperative feature ? On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:50:26 +0200 (CEST) wrote: > Hi, > are sequencing (;) and block structure (begin ... end) functional > features or imperative ones ? sequencing is imperative. begin and end are just an alias for '(' and ')' and are used in both styles. Christopher -- OpenPGP public key: http://gmerlin.de/christopher.pub fingerprint: 1917 680A 723C BF3D 2CA3 0E44 7E24 D19F 34B8 2A2A